Interventions to Reduce Pediatric Prescribing Errors in Professional Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review of the Last Decade.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric medication therapy is prone to errors due to the need for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic individualization and the diverse settings in which pediatric patients are treated. Prescribing errors have been reported as the most common medication error. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to systematically identify interventions to reduce prescribing errors and corresponding patient harm in pediatric healthcare settings and to evaluate their impact. METHODS: Four databases were systematically screened (time range November 2011 to December 2019), and experimental studies were included. Interventions to reduce prescribing errors were extracted and classified according to a 'hierarchy of controls' model. RESULTS: Forty-five studies were included, and 70 individual interventions were identified. A bundle of interventions was more likely to reduce prescribing errors than a single intervention. Interventions classified as 'substitution or engineering controls' were more likely to reduce errors in comparison with 'administrative controls', as is expected from the hierarchy of controls model. Fourteen interventions were classified as substitution or engineering controls, including computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and clinical decision support (CDS) systems. Administrative controls, including education, expert consultations, and guidelines, were more commonly identified than higher level controls, although they may be less likely to reduce errors. Of the administrative controls, expert consultations were most likely to reduce errors. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to reduce pediatric prescribing errors are more likely to be successful when implemented as part of a bundle of interventions. Interventions including CPOE and CDS that substitute risks or provide engineering controls should be prioritized and implemented with appropriate administrative controls including expert consultation.

A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Medication Safety Incidents Reported in Neonatal and Children's Intensive Care.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill neonates and paediatric patients may be at a greater risk of medication-related safety incidents than those in other clinical areas. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the nature of, and contributory factors associated with, medication-related safety incidents reported in neonatal and paediatric intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: We carried out a mixed-methods analysis of anonymised medication safety incidents reported to the National Reporting and Learning System that involved children (aged ≤ 18 years) admitted to ICUs across England and Wales over a 9-year period (2010-2018). Data were analysed descriptively, and free-text descriptions of harmful incidents were examined to explore potential contributory factors associated with incidents. RESULTS: In total, 25,567 eligible medication-related incident reports were examined. Incidents commonly occurred during the medicines administration (n = 13,668 [53.5%]) and prescribing stages (n = 7412 [29%]). The most commonly implicated error types were drug omission (n = 4812 [18.8%]) and dosing errors (n = 4475 [17.5%]). Neonates were commonly involved in reported incidents (n = 12,235 [47.9%]). Anti-infectives (n = 6483 [25.4%]) were the medications most commonly associated with incidents and commonly involved neonates. Incidents that were reported to have caused patient harm accounted for 12.2% (n = 3129) and commonly involved neonates (n = 1570/3129 [50.2%]). Common contributing factors to harmful incidents included staff-related factors (68.7%), such as failure to follow protocols or errors in documentation, which were often associated with working conditions, inadequate guidelines, and design of systems and protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Neonates were commonly involved in medication-related incidents reported in children's intensive care settings. Improvements in staffing and workload, design of systems and processes, and the use of anti-infective medications may reduce this risk.

Outcomes of Medication Misadventure Among People With Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate mortality and hospitalization outcomes associated with medication misadventure (including medication errors [MEs], such as the use of potentially inappropriate medications [PIMs], and adverse drug events [ADEs]) among people with cognitive impairment or dementia. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to December 2019. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant studies using any study design were included. Reviewers independently performed critical appraisal and extracted relevant data. DATA SYNTHESIS: The systematic review included 10 studies that reported the outcomes of mortality or hospitalization associated with medication misadventure, including PIMs (n=5), ADEs (n=2), a combination of MEs and ADEs (n=2), and drug interactions (n=1). Five studies examining the association between PIMs and mortality/hospitalization were included in the meta-analyses. Exposure to PIMs was not associated with either mortality (odds ratio [OR]=1.36; 95%CI=0.79-2.35) or hospitalization (OR=1.02; 95%CI=0.83-1.26). In contrast, single studies indicated that ADEs with cholinesterase inhibitors were associated with mortality and hospitalization. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Individuals with cognitive impairment or dementia are at increased risk of medication misadventure; based on relatively limited published data, this does not necessarily translate to increased mortality and hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, medication misadventure was not associated with mortality or hospitalization in people with cognitive impairment or dementia, noting the limited number of studies, difficulty in controlling potential confounding variables, and that most studies focus on PIMs.

A systematic review examining the characteristics of users of NHS patient medicines helpline services, and the types of enquiries they make.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patient medicines helpline services (PMHS) are available from some National Health Service Trusts in the UK to support patients following their discharge from hospital. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the available evidence regarding the characteristics of enquirers and enquiries to PMHS, in order to develop recommendations for service improvement. METHODS: Searches were conducted using Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and Web of Science, on 4 June 2019. Forward and backward citation searches were conducted, and grey literature was searched. Studies were included if they reported any characteristics of enquirers who use PMHS, and/or enquiries received. Study quality was assessed using the Axis tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted, and where appropriate, weighted means (WMs) were calculated. Where possible, outcomes were compared with Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data for England, to establish whether the profile of helpline users may differ to that of hospital patients. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included (~4362 enquiries). Risk of bias from assessed studies was 71%. Enquirers were predominantly female (WM=53%; HES mean=57%), elderly (WM=69 years; HES mean=53 years) and enquired regarding themselves (WM=72%). Out of inpatient and outpatient enquirers, 50% were inpatients and 50% were outpatients (WM). Six of 15 studies reported adverse effects as the main enquiry reason. Two of four studies reported antimicrobial drugs as the main enquiry drug class. From two studies, the main clinical origin of enquiries were general surgery and cardiology. Across six studies, 27% (WM) of enquiries concerned medicines-related errors. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that PMHS are often used by elderly patients, which is important since this group may be particularly vulnerable to experiencing medicines-related issues following hospital discharge. Over a quarter of enquiries to PMHS may concern medicines-related errors, suggesting that addressing such errors is an important function of this service. However, our study findings may be limited by a high risk of bias within included studies. Further research could provide a more detailed profile of helpline users (eg, ethnicity, average number of medicines consumed), and we encourage helpline providers to use their enquiry data to conduct local projects to improve hospital services (eg, reducing errors). PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018116276.

System-Level Patient Safety Practices That Aim to Reduce Medication Errors Associated With Infusion Pumps: An Evidence Review.

OBJECTIVES: In this literature review, we discuss 2 system-level, nurse-targeted patient safety practices (PSPs) that aim to reduce medication errors associated with infusion pumps, including smart pumps. One practice focuses on implementing structured process changes and redesigning workflows to improve efficiencies with pump use. The other focuses on investing in initial and ongoing staff training on the correct use, maintenance, and monitoring of infusion pumps. METHODS: Two databases were searched for "infusion pumps" and related synonyms, along with relevant terms for each PSP. Articles were excluded if outcomes were not directly relevant to the PSP addressed in this review, the article was out of scope, or study design was insufficiently described. RESULTS: Limited research was found on best practices for reducing errors and improving infusion pump use through workflow and process changes, as well as education and training. Four studies reported medication administration errors, procedural errors, or deviations from hospital policy as clinical outcomes of workflow or process changes. Mixed results were found examining process outcomes related to pump handling. Education on the correct use of smart pumps was found to decrease medication errors and adverse drug events, and 2 studies found an increase in nurses' adherence to using the medication safety software library as a result of education. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of process and integration of technology and workflows were found as facilitators. Type and content of education provided were identified as facilitators, whereas time and energy constraints on nurse educators can be barriers to implementing large hospital-wide education programs.

Interruptions Then and Now: Impact on Nurses' Clinical Reasoning, Emotions, and Medication Safety.

Nurses transitioning to care and novice-level nurses experience difficulty managing interruptions in the acute care setting, which can result in loss of attention and potential errors. Understanding better the characteristics surrounding interruptions will better guide staff development educators in designing management strategies as well as improving clinical reasoning that supports a culture of safety among staff and professional partners.

Framework for Pharmacy Services Quality Improvement-A Bridge to Cross the Quality Chasm.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on the subject of quality improvement principles and methods applied to pharmacy services and to describe a framework for current and future efforts in pharmacy services quality improvement and effective drug therapy management. BACKGROUND: The Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy produced the Catalog of Pharmacy Quality Indicators in 1997, followed by the Summary of National Pharmacy Quality Measures in February 1999. In April 2002, AMCP introduced Pharmacy's Framework for Drug Therapy Management in the 21st Century. The Framework documents include a self-assessment tool that details more than 250 specific "components" that describe tasks, behaviors, skills, functions, duties, and responsibilities that contribute to meeting customer expectations for effective drug therapy management. FINDINGS: There are many opportunities for quality improvement in clinical, service, and cost outcomes related to drug therapy management. These may include patient safety; incidence of medical errors; adverse drug events; patient adherence to therapy; attainment of target goals of blood pressure, glucose, and lipid levels; risk reduction for adverse cardiac events and osteoporotic-related fractures; patient satisfaction; risk of hospitalization or mortality; and cost of care. Health care practitioners can measure improvements in health care quality in several ways including (a) a better patient outcome at the same cost, (b) the same patient outcome at lower cost, (c) a better patient outcome at lower cost, or (d) a significantly better patient outcome at moderately higher cost. Measurement makes effective management possible. A framework of component factors (e.g., tasks) is necessary to facilitate changes in the key processes and critical factors that will help individual practitioners and health care systems meet customer expectations in regard to drug therapy, thus improving these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement in health care services in the United States will be made in incremental changes that rely on a structure-process-outcome model. The structure is provided by evidence created from controlled randomized trials and other studies of care and system outcomes that are based on the scientific method. The process portion is created by the application of evidence in the form of clinical practice guidelines, clinical practice models, and self-assessment tools such as Pharmacy's Framework for Drug Therapy Management. Incremental changes in structure and process will result in the desirable outcome of meeting customer needs for more effective drug therapy and disease management. DISCLOSURES: Authors Richard N. Fry and Steven G. Avey are employed by the Foundation for Managed Care Pharmacy, a nonprofit charitable trust that serves as the educational and philanthropic arm of the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy; author Frederic R. Curtiss performed the majority of work associated with this manuscript prior to becoming editor-in-chief of the Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy. This manuscript underwent blinded peer review and was subject to the same standards as every article published in JMCP.

The impact of implementing a pharmacy technician role as part of a nursing team in an acute admissions unit.

Background: The National Patient Safety Agency reported over 20 000 safety incidents over a 3-year period, including 68 severe harms and 27 deaths. Dose delays and omissions persistently contributed to more than 50% of the reported incidents. Methods: A pilot was designed and data were collected before and after to measure how these ward-based technician roles affected the reporting of omitted or delayed doses, time efficiency, cost implications and the general productivity of the ward. Results: Three months after the start of the pilot, omitted doses were reduced from 14% to 5% and no incidents of harm had been reported. The 'perfect medication ward round' with no interruptions lasted 23 min compared with the longest medication ward round which lasted 116 min and was interrupted 11 times. Conclusions: The pilot shows that the introduction of pharmacy technicians results in fewer omitted doses and also addresses persistent staffing issues by ensuring better use of nursing time.

The role of clinical pharmacist trainees in medication reconciliation process at hospital admission.

Background Medication discrepancies are a common occurrence following hospital admission and carry the potential for causing harm. However, little is known about the prevalence and potential risk factors involved in medication discrepancies in China. Objective To determine the frequency of medication discrepancies and the associated risk factors and evaluate the potential harmsof errors prevented by pharmacist trainees performing medication reconciliation process. Setting A tertiary hospital in Shanxi, China. Method Medication reconciliation was conducted at admission to four clinical departments including cardiology, nephrology, endocrinology and pneumology department between 2019 Feb 1st and 2019 Aug 31st by clinical pharmacist trainees. All unintentional medication discrepancies were presented to the expert panel to evaluate. Associations between unintentional medication discrepancies and various factors were examined. Main outcome measure The primary outcome was the prevalence of unintentional medication discrepancies as well as the associated risk factors. Results Overall, 331 patients were included (mean age 59.7 ± 15.2 years; 176 men). The reconciliation process identified 511 drug discrepancies, 98 of which were unintentional medication discrepancies; these occurred in 74 patients. The most common unintentional medication discrepancies type was omission (40.8%), followed by incorrect dose (25.5%), and 73.5% could have caused patients moderate to significant harm and complications. 5 or more drugs and 2 or more chronic diseases at admission associated with unintentional medication discrepancies in a logistic regression analysis. Conclusion Medication reconciliation performed by pharmacist trainees upon admission can reduce unintentional medication discrepancies. Patients taking 5 or more drugs and experiencing more than two chronic diseases were found to be particularly at risk.

Comparison of pharmacy technicians' and doctors' medication transcribing errors at hospital discharge.

Objectives: To compare the transcribing error rates of discharge prescriptions between pharmacy technicians and doctors in an acute hospital setting. Methods: Pharmacy technicians were trained in the transcribing of discharge medications from inpatient to discharge medication charts. Prospective prescribing audits were undertaken over 5 days on eight hospital medical wards by ward pharmacists to compare pharmacy technician (on four wards) and doctor (on four wards) discharge transcribing error rates. Transcribed discharge medications were compared with the inpatient medication list by ward pharmacists to identify any transcription errors. Transcribing data for each technician and doctor, and number of items and errors, were input into SPSS and analysed using relevant statistical tests. Results: Doctors (n=12) transcribed 77 discharge prescriptions, and 678 items with 127 errors recorded (18.7% error rate). Pharmacy technicians (n=8) transcribed 63 discharge prescriptions, and 654 items with 25 errors recorded (3.8% error rate), a significant difference between groups in error frequency (χ2(1)=58.6, p=<0.005) with a 14.9% difference between groups. Conclusions: Pharmacy technicians have significantly lower discharge transcribing error rates compared with doctors. This service intervention has the potential to improve patient safety and minimise inefficiencies from correcting errors. Further work is needed to explore the views and opinions of service users of the intervention, and why technician-transcribing error rates are significantly lower than doctors.

Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Team on Reducing Antiretroviral Medication Errors.

Background: Numerous interventions have been used to reduce medication errors related to antiretroviral (ARV) therapy for hospitalized patients with HIV. Objective: This study assessed the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship (ASP) team intervention on reducing the rate of ARV therapy errors in patients admitted to an academic medical center. Methods: This observational, retrospective study included patients who received ARV therapy from June 2016 to December 2017. The primary outcome was evaluation of ASP team performance in detecting ARV medication errors in the inpatient setting. Errors were further categorized by type (interaction, dosing, regimen). The Mann-Whitney U test and χ2 tests were utilized to analyze continuous and categorical data, respectively. Results: Medication errors occurred in 51% of patients in the preintervention group (n = 152) and 48% of patients in the postintervention group (n = 203; P = 0.43). The most frequent medication error type was drug interactions in both groups, involving integrase strand transfer inhibitors and polyvalent cations (64% vs 67%). There was a significant difference between preintervention and postintervention groups regarding number of errors detected (13 vs 106, P < 0.001), corrected (12 vs 86, P < 0.001), and persisting at discharge (106 vs 18, P < 0.001). Conclusion and Relevance: Review of ARV regimens by an ASP team significantly decreased medication errors. Drug interactions are the most common medication error found in HIV-positive patients admitted to our academic center.

Reasons for Drug Administration Problems and Perceived Needs for Assistance of Patients, Family Caregivers, and Nurses: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: Investigation of drug administration problems, respective causes, and needs for assistance. METHODS: Focus group discussions with patients, family caregivers, and nurses were conducted using a semi-structured interview guideline for a focused exploration of the participants' drug administration experiences and perceived needs for assistance. All discussions were audio-recorded and video-recorded, verbatim transcribed, and analyzed according to Mayring's qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: In total, 6 focus group discussions were conducted. The qualitative content analysis revealed that patients and family caregivers frequently trivialized drug administration, were unaware of errors, and primarily blamed the dosage form of causing administration problems. Nurses also considered health-care system-related conditions and patient factors as potential causes of administration problems. CONCLUSIONS: The administration problems and perceived causes were multifaceted and often directed toward inappropriate dosage forms or health-care system-related conditions rather than critically questioning the medicine user's administration skills. To increase medicine users' motivation to scrutinize wrong administration practices, health-care professionals should consider individual perspectives on administration problems and perceived causes, assist medicine users' to identify the true cause of a distinct problem, and provide individualized support.

An Automated Software Application Reduces Controlled Substance Discrepancies in Perioperative Areas.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative controlled substance diversion and tracking have received increased regulatory focus throughout the United States. The authors' institution developed and implemented an automated web-based software application for perioperative controlled substance management. The authors hypothesized that implementation of such a system reduces errors as measured by missing controlled substance medications, missing controlled substance kits (a package of multiple controlled substance medications), and missing witness signatures during kit return. METHODS: From December 1, 2014 to March 31, 2017, the authors obtained missing controlled substance medication, controlled substance kit, and witness return signature data during the preimplementation, implementation, and study period of the controlled substance management application at a single university hospital. This before and after study was based on a QI project at the authors' institution. The authors included all cases requiring anesthesia services. The primary outcome of this study was the rate of missing controlled substance medications. Secondary outcomes included rates for kits not returned to pharmacy and missing kit return witness signatures. RESULTS: There were 54,302 cases during the preimplementation period, 57,670 cases during the implementation period, and 65,911 cases during the study period. The number of missing controlled substance medication (difference 0.7 per 1,000 cases; 95% CI, 0.38-1.02; P < 0.001) and kit return errors (difference 0.45 per 1,000 cases; 95% CI, 0.24-0.66, P < 0.001) declined after implementation of the application. There was no difference in the number of missing witness return signatures (difference 0.09 per 1,000 cases; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.26, P = 0.350). A user survey with 206 of 485 (42%) response rate demonstrated that providers believed the new application managed controlled substances better than the previous system. CONCLUSIONS: A software application that tracks perioperative controlled substance kits with deep integration into the electronic health record and pharmacy systems is associated with a decrease in management errors.

Improving Safety of Intravenous Prostacyclin Administration to Pediatric Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension is a rare, life-threatening disease with limited therapeutic options and no definitive cure. Continuous intravenous prostacyclin therapy is indicated for treatment of severe disease. These medications have a narrow therapeutic index and a brief half-life; therefore, administration errors can be lethal. OBJECTIVE: To reduce medication errors through an inpatient program to improve, standardize, and disseminate continuous intravenous prostacyclin therapy practice guidelines. METHODS: Data were collected from the electronic safety reporting system of a single hospital to determine the number and types of continuous intravenous prostacyclin therapy errors that were reported over an 8-year period. A clinical database and hospital pharmacy records were used to determine the number of days on which hospitalized pediatric patients received the therapy. INTERVENTIONS: A nursing-directed quality improvement initiative to enhance the safety of continuous intravenous prostacyclin therapy for pediatric patients was begun in January 2009. Efforts to improve safety fell into 4 domains: policy, process, education, and hospital-wide safety initiatives. RESULTS: The number of therapy errors per 1000 patient days fell from 19.28 in 2009 to 5.95 in 2016. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the result for 2009 with that for each subsequent year, with P values of .66, .35, .16, .09, .03, .12, and .25 found for 2010 through 2016, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The trend in reduction of continuous intravenous prostacyclin therapy errors suggests that proactive processes to standardize its administration, emphasizing both policy and education, reduce medication errors and increase patient safety.

Device-Related Error in Patient-Controlled Analgesia: Analysis of 82,698 Patients in a Tertiary Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is one of the most popular and effective methods for managing postoperative pain. Various types of continuous infusion pumps are available for the safe and accurate administration of analgesic drugs. Here we report the causes and clinical outcomes of device-related errors in PCA. METHODS: Clinical records from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2014 were collected by acute pain service team nurses in a 2715-bed tertiary hospital. Devices for all types of PCA, including intravenous PCA, epidural PCA, and nerve block PCA, were included for analysis. The following 4 types of infusion pumps were used during the study period: elastomeric balloon infusers, carbon dioxide-driven infusers, semielectronic disposable pumps, and electronic programmable pumps. We categorized PCA device-related errors based on the error mechanism and clinical features. RESULTS: Among 82,698 surgical patients using PCA, 610 cases (0.74%) were reported as human error, and 155 cases (0.19%) of device-related errors were noted during the 4-year study period. The most common type of device-related error was underflow, which was observed in 47 cases (30.3%). The electronic programmable pump exhibited the high incidence of errors in PCA (70 of 15,052 patients; 0.47%; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.59) among the 4 types of devices, and 96 of 152 (63%) patients experienced some type of adverse outcome, ranging from minor symptoms to respiratory arrest. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PCA device-related errors was <0.2% and significantly differed according to the infusion pump type. A total of 63% of patients with PCA device-related errors suffered from adverse clinical outcomes, with no mortality. Recent technological advances may contribute to reducing the incidence and severity of PCA errors. Nonetheless, the results of this study can be used to improve patient safety and ensure quality care.

Work overload is related to increased risk of error during chemotherapy preparation.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy preparation units face peaks in activity leading to high workloads and increased stress. The present study evaluated the impact of work overloads on the safety and accuracy of manual preparations. METHOD: Simulating overwork, operators were asked to produce increasing numbers of syringes (8, 16, and 24), with markers (phenylephrine or lidocaine), within 1 h, in an isolator, under aseptic conditions. Results were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative criteria. Concentration deviations of < 5%, 5%-10%, 10%-30%, and >30% from the expected concentration were considered as accurate, weakly accurate, inaccurate, and wrong concentrations, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-one pharmacy technicians and pharmacists carried out 63 preparation sessions (n = 1007 syringes). A statistically significant decrease in the manufacturing time for one syringe was observed when workload increased (p < 0.0001). Thirty-nine preparation errors were recorded: 30 wrong concentrations (deviation > 30%), 6 mislabeling, 2 wrong diluents, and 1 wrong drug. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean concentration accuracy of final preparations across the three workloads. The overall error rate increased with the number of preparations made in 1 h: 1.8% for 8 preparations, 2.7% for 16 preparations, and 5.4% for 24 preparations (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although pharmacy technicians and pharmacists were able to increase production speeds with no effect on mean concentration accuracy under stressful conditions, there were greater probability errors being made. These results should encourage actions to spread workloads out over the day to avoid peaks in activity.

Adverse Events in Anesthesia: An Integrative Review.

PURPOSE: This study conducted an integrative review of the literature in a search for scientific evidence related to the occurrence of perioperative adverse events resulting from anesthesia. DESIGN: Integrative review. METHODS: The search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Virtual Health Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and Web of Science databases and portals, including studies published in Portuguese, English, or Spanish, from 1997 to 2017. The studies were supposed to assess adverse events associated exclusively with anesthesia care. FINDINGS: We selected 21 studies. The main adverse events in anesthesia were respiratory, drug error, cardiology, and neurology. Most of the events were related to human errors, slips, and lapses that resulted in damage to the patient, such as permanent injuries or death. CONCLUSIONS: Care planning, efficient communication, and teamwork are critical to prevent adverse events in anesthesia.

Use of a tablet computer application to engage patients in updating their medication list.

PURPOSE: Failure to obtain an accurate medication history can adversely affect patient care in the emergency department (ED) and propagate errors into the inpatient and outpatient settings. Obtaining an accurate medication history in the ED is challenging, however, due to limited time, a suboptimal environment for patient interaction, and inadequate information in the electronic health record (EHR). This article describes the development and initial evaluation of the PictureRx Medication History Application, a tablet computer-based program that queries patients' prescription fill data from the Surescripts Medication History service and renders it graphically for review and editing at the point of care. METHODS: A quasi-experimental trial of PictureRx was performed in a large academic ED. Adult patients taking at least 1 prescription medication were prospectively eligible for the intervention. Usual care control patients were retrospectively matched 1:1. The main outcomes were updates to the patients' existing pre-visit medication list in the EHR and patient perceptions of the application. RESULTS: The medication list was updated for 101/244 (41.4%) of the intervention group and for 43/244 (17.6%) of the control group (difference 23.8%, 95% confidence interval, 16.0-31.6%). Similar differences were observed for medication additions, removals, and corrections in dose. Approximately 80% of intervention patients "strongly agreed" that the application was easy to use, aided medication list accuracy, and the graphical features assisted with recall. CONCLUSION: A novel tablet computer-based medication history application was feasible to implement in a busy academic ED. Use of the tool was associated with more updates to patients' EHR medication list.